We hypothesize that people’s attitudes toward gender will guide
their support toward welfare programs and their recipients. This is driven by
ideas generated through past opinions regarding gender and normative gender
ideals that have continued to impact attitudes regarding gender today. For
example, we found support of the gender gap in regards to the bread-winning
regulations. Even if men didn’t have the means, they were legally forced to
provide for their families and act as the “bread-winners”, or they would be
considered dead-beat fathers. These regulations were all passed in an effort to
potentially save money for the United States government. Instead of these women
going on welfare programs for financial assistance, the financial burden
instead went on the father. We concluded that this would contribute to a bias
among men in terms of their support for programs benefitting women and
generated a gendered perspective for the welfare system.
Understanding who and what each welfare program benefitted is also
important in regards to our hypothesis. We assumed that more people who support
ideas of feminism would also support programs such as WIC (Women, Infants,
Children). As stated in previous research, women are more likely to support
programs that benefit women. This idea does not only pertain to WIC, but also,
as proven in an ANES study, it is more common for women to favor higher levels
of spending on the poor (Conover
& Lowery) .
In another ANES study on compassion and American public opinion,
it was found that women are more caring and compassionate than men (Steenbergen) . The study also
found that when taking away race and ideology, the likelihood for supporting
men and women on welfare went up (Steenbergen) . Also, setting
race and ideology to neutral the study shows that women and men’s support for
government spending increases (Steenbergen) . The study
emphasized the exact impact of gender on these opinions alone. While both
men and women support increased, the female support began larger and increased
more than the male support.
No comments:
Post a Comment